Decoy discrimination
- Problem
- Amplitude-only can’t tell real assets from decoys.
- Phase information
- Phase stability exposes the material: metal vs rubber.
- Operational output
- Fewer false positives, fewer wasted resources.
Our purpose
We turn raw radar into mission-grade intelligence.
In radar, the richest information lives in the phase and wave structure, before the signal ever becomes an image. Standard computer vision throws it away. We read the full wave.
What we build
AI for physical signals
Where we start
Raw radar / SAR
What you get
Mission-grade intelligence
AI's current blind spot
Radar data contains two signals: amplitude and phase. Current AI models only learn from amplitude, and throw phase away.
Sensor output: full radar data
Full signal: amplitude + phase captured
The AI bottleneck
Phase is discarded: 50% data loss
Blind decisions
Amplitude-only models fail: missed targets, false alarms
50%
Raw data thrown away
M$
Lost at the software layer
The lost information, visually
Most AI models treat phase as noise and discard it, becoming blind to valuable physical signals.
What gets destroyed
Phase texture · material signature · millimetric variations
Same scene, two readouts
Left: what an amplitude-only model learns from. Right: the same return read with the full wave. Same sensor, same pixels — the difference is the phase.
Full wave · PerspeQtive Amplitude only The core
Our engine reads amplitude and phase on standard GPUs: the part of the signal others discard. It's built and validated on real SAR today, and it's the core we build our radar models on. No quantum hardware.
Our edge is mathematical. We use quantum mathematics to represent wave structure that image-based AI can't, running at AI speed on standard GPUs.
Why now · where it matters
Across today's defining theaters — Ukraine, the Middle East, Europe's contested seas — the easy signal (transponders, GPS, clean imagery) is failing or being spoofed. Here's what reading the full wave makes possible, and the missions where it matters.
The same phase powers Europe's millimetric monitoring of dams, bridges and rail (Copernicus European Ground Motion Service). Context drawn from NATO critical-infrastructure operations, reported GNSS interference at major straits, and open SAR / InSAR literature.
Benchmarks — measured on SAR archive data
+0 dB
Target contrast gap
TCR median: +7.32 dB vs +0.74 dB
The detector sees the target more clearly before classification.
0×
Class separation
Fisher: 0.413 vs 0.194
Fewer object classes get confused at the decision boundary.
+0pp
Speckle robustness
Accuracy in noise: 71.6% vs 53.2%
Works on raw SAR, not just cleaned imagery.
Measured on real SAR archive data, against a like-for-like classical baseline.
Our vision
Today the world’s radar archives are read as images, and most of the signal is discarded. Our goal is to own the path from raw signal to trusted intelligence, everywhere wave physics carries the answer. Radar first, physical signals beyond.
The company that makes raw radar waves usable by AI.
European, built for sovereign deployment.
Background & vision
Developed GPU-accelerated quantum simulation software at QbitSoft and complex algorithms at J.P. Morgan, specializing in processing high-dimensional mathematics on standard hardware.
Independently coded and validated PerspeQtive's core quantum-inspired vision layer, achieving a proven +6.58 dB target contrast improvement on raw Level-1 SLC radar data.
Actively onboarding a CTO to deploy the AI models. Pre-incubation in Quantum Launchpad.
Founder & CEO
CentraleSupélec / NUS Singapore
Master in Quantum Machine Learning
Start here
What is hidden in your raw signals has value.
Start with a data study: we run our engine on your SAR archive and show you what the phase recovers.